© 2022 Blue Ridge Public Radio
Main Banner Background
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Available On Air Stations
Sign up now for BPR's Weekly Update enews

Federal Judge Upholds NC's Sweeping Election Overhaul

Erik (HASH) Hersman
/
Flickr https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

A federal judge in Winston-Salem ruled Monday night that North Carolina's sweeping election overhaul is constitutional. The U.S. Justice Department, the North Carolina NAACP and others sued over the 2013 law, calling it one of the most restrictive in the nation. WFAE's Michael Tomsic joined Marshall Terry to walk through the decision.

Let's start with voter ID. What did the judge rule on that?

Judge Thomas Schroeder said that even though there's very little evidence of voting fraud, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that trying to reduce it is fair game for a state. He points out that North Carolina allows a variety of excuses not to have an ID, and that a federal court upheld a virtually identical photo ID law in South Carolina. 

Erik (HASH) Hersman
/

So the ID provision stands here as well. But North Carolina's overhaul went well beyond ID. What about the other changes?

They all stand. The U.S. Justice Department had argued they were discriminatory. That's because African-Americans disproportionately used early voting, same-day registration and out-of-precinct voting, which were all reduced or eliminated in the overhaul.

But Judge Schroeder noted that African-Americans fared better on registration and turnout rates in the 2014 midterm - after the law was implemented. In fact, he says the turnout disparity that election between African-Americans and whites was the smallest it's been in any midterm election since 2002.

How did comparisons to other states factor into his ruling?

That was one of the key arguments attorneys representing North Carolina made: the overhaul makes North Carolina more like other states, not less. The majority of states don't offer same-day registration or out-of-precinct voting. They do offer early voting, and North Carolina still does too, although it's a week shorter. And many states require some kind of ID.

Judge Schroeder added all that up to say North Carolina, after the overhaul, is in "the mainstream of other states."

Because of these lawsuits, there have been parts of the law in effect and parts on hold. What happens next?

The parts on hold will stay on hold through the Congressional primary in June. That means people can still register and vote on the same day during early voting, and they can vote out-of-precinct on election day. Judge Schroeder noted there's a Supreme Court precedent for not wanting to change policies too close to an election.

But what about the November general election?

Those options will be gone. The overhaul will be fully in effect: 10 days of early voting instead of 17, and people will need photo ID. That's of course assuming there's not another decision. The plaintiffs haven't announced yet if they'll appeal, and if they do, it's possible there's another ruling could come by November. 

The above was updated at 6:45 a.m. Tuesday. 

A federal judge has upheld North Carolina's sweeping election overhaul. The U.S. Justice Department lost its argument that voter ID and other provisions are discriminatory. 

In 2013, North Carolina's Republican lawmakers cut early voting, eliminated same-day registration and created an ID requirement. The U.S. Justice Department and others sued. They said the changes disproportionately impact African-Americans in violation of the Voting Rights Act. 

Federal Judge Thomas Schroeder ruled late Monday night against those claims. In upholding all the challenged parts of the law, he noted it puts North Carolina's election rules in line with most other states. And on the impact to minorities, Judge Schroeder says their turnout in the 2014 midterm confirms they still enjoy equal opportunities to vote. 

Copyright 2016 WFAE

Michael Tomsic became a full-time reporter for WFAE in August 2012. Before that, he reported for the station as a freelancer and intern while he finished his senior year at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Heââ
Michael Tomsic
Michael Tomsic covers health care, voting rights, NASCAR, peach-shaped water towers and everything in between. He drivesWFAE'shealth care coverage through a partnership with NPR and Kaiser Health News. He became a full-time reporter forWFAEin August 2012. Before that, he reported for the station as a freelancer and intern while he finished his senior year at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He interned with Weekends on All Things Considered in Washington, D.C., where he contributed to the show’s cover stories, produced interviews withNasand BranfordMarsalis, and reported a story about a surge of college graduates joining the military. AtUNC, he was the managing editor of the student radio newscast, Carolina Connection. He got his start in public radio as an intern withWHQRin Wilmington, N.C., where he grew up.
Marshall came to WFAE after graduating from Appalachian State University, where he worked at the campus radio station and earned a degree in communication. Outside of radio, he loves listening to music and going to see bands - preferably in small, dingy clubs.
Related Content