© 2024 Blue Ridge Public Radio
Blue Ridge Mountains banner background
Your source for information and inspiration in Western North Carolina.
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

How NC Fits Into Recent Court Rulings On Voting Rights

www.natcom.org

Federal courts have struck down voting laws in North Carolina and several other states recently. WFAE's Michael Tomsic has this national roundup.  

The legal battle over voting rights has amped up in recent years. After the Tea Party wave of 2010, Republicans in many state legislatures started working on voter ID, early voting cuts and other changes. A U.S. Supreme Court decision in 2013 accelerated the pace, says Jennifer Clark of the Brennan Center, which advocates for voting rights nationwide.

"That had the result such that certain states with a history of discrimination at the polls, they didn't have to get their voting laws pre-cleared," she said on WFAE's Charlotte Talks. "We have seen states that used to be under that part of the Voting Rights Act, such as North Carolina, Virginia, Arizona, put these laws into place, and they're now facing litigation."

The lawsuits often come down to the impact on African-Americans, who are more likely to lack IDs, use early voting and cast their ballots for Democrats.

Last month, federal appeals courts struck down voter ID requirements in North Carolina and Texas. The North Carolina decision went far beyond ID. Judges ruled early voting cuts, the elimination of same-day registration and other changes were passed with discriminatory intent.

Early voting cuts have also been stuck down in Ohio. Clark says rulings in Wisconsin have been more of a mixed bag.

"Wisconsin might be enforcing its strict voter ID law this November," she said. "But on the flip side, some of the cutbacks to early voting there have been struck down by a court. A court found those were intentionally discriminatory as well."

Several federal judges have noted the U.S. Supreme Court precedent for upholding voter ID. The nation's highest court approved Indiana's ID law in 2008, ruling states have a legitimate interest in trying to prevent voter fraud. That's the main argument Republicans have made for the changes.

Many attorneys have called North Carolina's voting overhaul the most sweeping in the country. It may also be the next one to reach the U.S. Supreme Court.

Copyright 2016 WFAE

Michael Tomsic became a full-time reporter for WFAE in August 2012. Before that, he reported for the station as a freelancer and intern while he finished his senior year at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Heââ
Michael Tomsic
Michael Tomsic covers health care, voting rights, NASCAR, peach-shaped water towers and everything in between. He drivesWFAE'shealth care coverage through a partnership with NPR and Kaiser Health News. He became a full-time reporter forWFAEin August 2012. Before that, he reported for the station as a freelancer and intern while he finished his senior year at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He interned with Weekends on All Things Considered in Washington, D.C., where he contributed to the show’s cover stories, produced interviews withNasand BranfordMarsalis, and reported a story about a surge of college graduates joining the military. AtUNC, he was the managing editor of the student radio newscast, Carolina Connection. He got his start in public radio as an intern withWHQRin Wilmington, N.C., where he grew up.